AWS vs Azure vs GCP: Choosing the Right Cloud for ML Workloads
Published on November 20, 2025
Choosing a cloud platform for machine learning involves trade-offs between features, pricing, ecosystem, and your team's expertise. Having deployed ML solutions on all three major clouds, here's my practical comparison.
ML Platform Overview
| Feature | AWS SageMaker | Azure ML | GCP Vertex AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Notebooks | SageMaker Studio | Azure ML Studio | Workbench |
| AutoML | Autopilot | Automated ML | AutoML |
| Training | Training Jobs | Compute Clusters | Custom Training |
| Deployment | Endpoints | Managed Endpoints | Prediction |
| MLOps | Pipelines | Pipelines | Pipelines |
AWS SageMaker
Strengths
- Mature ecosystem: Most extensive ML service catalog
- Built-in algorithms: 17+ optimized algorithms
- Spot training: Up to 90% cost savings
- Ground Truth: Data labeling at scale
Example: Training on SageMaker
import sagemaker
from sagemaker.pytorch import PyTorch
# Configure estimator
estimator = PyTorch(
entry_point='train.py',
source_dir='./src',
role=sagemaker.get_execution_role(),
instance_count=1,
instance_type='ml.p3.2xlarge',
framework_version='2.0',
py_version='py310',
hyperparameters={
'epochs': 50,
'batch-size': 64,
'learning-rate': 0.001
}
)
# Start training
estimator.fit({'training': 's3://my-bucket/train-data'})
Azure Machine Learning
Strengths
- Enterprise integration: Seamless with Microsoft ecosystem
- Designer: No-code ML pipeline builder
- Responsible AI: Built-in fairness and explainability tools
- Hybrid support: Arc-enabled ML for on-premises
Example: Training on Azure ML
from azure.ai.ml import MLClient, command
from azure.identity import DefaultAzureCredential
# Initialize client
ml_client = MLClient(
DefaultAzureCredential(),
subscription_id="your-sub-id",
resource_group_name="your-rg",
workspace_name="your-workspace"
)
# Define training job
job = command(
code="./src",
command="python train.py --epochs 50 --lr 0.001",
environment="AzureML-pytorch-2.0-cuda11.8@latest",
compute="gpu-cluster",
experiment_name="crack-detection"
)
# Submit job
ml_client.jobs.create_or_update(job)
Google Cloud Vertex AI
Strengths
- TPU access: Best for large-scale training
- BigQuery ML: SQL-based ML for analysts
- Unified platform: Clean, consistent experience
- Research heritage: TensorFlow, JAX first-class support
Example: Training on Vertex AI
from google.cloud import aiplatform
# Initialize
aiplatform.init(project='my-project', location='us-central1')
# Create training job
job = aiplatform.CustomTrainingJob(
display_name='crack-detection-training',
script_path='train.py',
container_uri='us-docker.pkg.dev/vertex-ai/training/pytorch-gpu.2-0:latest',
requirements=['torchvision', 'pillow']
)
# Run training
model = job.run(
replica_count=1,
machine_type='n1-standard-8',
accelerator_type='NVIDIA_TESLA_V100',
accelerator_count=1,
args=['--epochs', '50', '--lr', '0.001']
)
Pricing Comparison
For a typical training workload (8 vCPU, 32GB RAM, V100 GPU, 100 hours/month):
| Cloud | Instance | On-Demand ($/hr) | Spot/Preemptible ($/hr) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AWS | ml.p3.2xlarge | $3.82 | $1.15 (70% off) |
| Azure | NC6s_v3 | $3.06 | $0.92 (70% off) |
| GCP | n1-standard-8 + V100 | $2.95 | $0.89 (70% off) |
When to Choose Each Cloud
Choose AWS SageMaker when:
- You need the most mature MLOps tooling
- Your organization is already on AWS
- You want extensive pre-built algorithms
Choose Azure ML when:
- You're in a Microsoft enterprise environment
- You need strong hybrid/on-premises support
- Responsible AI features are a priority
Choose GCP Vertex AI when:
- You're training very large models (TPU access)
- Your data is in BigQuery
- You prefer TensorFlow/JAX ecosystems
Conclusion
All three clouds offer capable ML platforms. The "best" choice depends on your existing infrastructure, team skills, and specific requirements. For most projects, start with your organization's primary cloud—the ecosystem integration benefits outweigh minor feature differences.